Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U vs Apple M2 Pro 10-Core

Aggregate performance score

Apple M2 Pro 10-Core
2023
10 cores / 10 threads, 2424 Watt
13.69
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 28 Watt
15.57
+13.7%

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U outperforms Apple M2 Pro 10-Core by a moderate 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Apple M2 Pro 10-Core and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking538441
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesApple M-SeriesAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
Power efficiencyno data52.63
Architecture codenameno dataPhoenix (Zen 4) (2023)
Release date17 January 2023 (1 year ago)3 May 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Apple M2 Pro 10-Core and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1016
Base clock speed2.424 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz5.1 GHz
L1 cache7.3 MB512 KB
L2 cache36 MB8 MB
L3 cache24 MB16 MB
Chip lithography5 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data178 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors40000 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+

Compatibility

Information on Apple M2 Pro 10-Core and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Power consumption (TDP)2424 ‑ 3696 Watt28 Watt

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPUAMD Radeon 780M

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Apple M2 Pro 10-Core 13.69
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U 15.57
+13.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Apple M2 Pro 10-Core 21741
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U 24726
+13.7%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Apple M2 Pro 10-Core 1664
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U 2218
+33.3%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Apple M2 Pro 10-Core 231
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U 265
+14.7%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Apple M2 Pro 10-Core 12132
+21.7%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U 9968

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Apple M2 Pro 10-Core 1937
+4.5%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U 1853

WebXPRT 3

Apple M2 Pro 10-Core 391
+38.2%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U 283

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.69 15.57
Recency 17 January 2023 3 May 2023
Physical cores 10 8
Threads 10 16
Chip lithography 5 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2424 Watt 28 Watt

Apple M2 Pro 10-Core has 25% more physical cores.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, on the other hand, has a 13.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 months, 60% more threads, a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 8557.1% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U is our recommended choice as it beats the Apple M2 Pro 10-Core in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M2 Pro 10-Core and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M2 Pro 10-Core
M2 Pro 10-Core
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 110 votes

Rate Apple M2 Pro 10-Core on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 46 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Apple M2 Pro 10-Core or Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.