Xeon Gold 6416H vs i7-13700F

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-13700F
2023
16 cores / 24 threads, 65 Watt
25.42
Xeon Gold 6416H
2023
18 cores / 36 threads, 165 Watt
26.53
+4.4%

Xeon Gold 6416H outperforms Core i7-13700F by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-13700F and Xeon Gold 6416H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking200187
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation56.6349.50
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency35.6614.66
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-S (2023−2024)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date4 January 2023 (1 year ago)10 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$359$1,444

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i7-13700F has 14% better value for money than Xeon Gold 6416H.

Detailed specifications

Core i7-13700F and Xeon Gold 6416H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)18 (Octadeca-Core)
Threads2436
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed5.2 GHz4.2 GHz
L1 cache80K (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache30 MB (shared)45 MB
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size257 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C82 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-13700F and Xeon Gold 6416H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration14
SocketFCLGA1700FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt165 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-13700F and Xeon Gold 6416H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Core i7-13700F and Xeon Gold 6416H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-13700F and Xeon Gold 6416H are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-13700F and Xeon Gold 6416H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-5600, DDR4-3200DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400
Maximum memory size192 GB4 TB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth89.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-13700F and Xeon Gold 6416H.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.05
PCI Express lanes1680

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-13700F 25.42
Xeon Gold 6416H 26.53
+4.4%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-13700F 38903
Xeon Gold 6416H 40606
+4.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 25.42 26.53
Physical cores 16 18
Threads 24 36
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 165 Watt

i7-13700F has 153.8% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 6416H, on the other hand, has a 4.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 12.5% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core i7-13700F and Xeon Gold 6416H.

Note that Core i7-13700F is a desktop processor while Xeon Gold 6416H is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-13700F and Xeon Gold 6416H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-13700F
Core i7-13700F
Intel Xeon Gold 6416H
Xeon Gold 6416H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 450 votes

Rate Core i7-13700F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Gold 6416H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-13700F or Xeon Gold 6416H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.