Xeon w9-3575X vs i7-13700F

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-13700F
2023
16 cores / 24 threads, 65 Watt
25.42
Xeon w9-3575X
2024
44 cores / 88 threads, 340 Watt
53.72
+111%

Xeon w9-3575X outperforms Core i7-13700F by a whopping 111% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-13700F and Xeon w9-3575X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20029
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation56.6333.41
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency35.6614.41
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-S (2023−2024)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date4 January 2023 (1 year ago)24 August 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$359$3,789

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i7-13700F has 70% better value for money than Xeon w9-3575X.

Detailed specifications

Core i7-13700F and Xeon w9-3575X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)44
Threads2488
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed5.2 GHz4.8 GHz
L1 cache80K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache30 MB (shared)97.5 MB
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size257 mm24x 477 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C79 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-13700F and Xeon w9-3575X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1700FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt340 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-13700F and Xeon w9-3575X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0++
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Core i7-13700F and Xeon w9-3575X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
SGXno data-
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-13700F and Xeon w9-3575X are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-13700F and Xeon w9-3575X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-5600, DDR4-3200DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size192 GB4 TB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth89.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-13700F and Xeon w9-3575X.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.05.0
PCI Express lanes16112

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-13700F 25.42
Xeon w9-3575X 53.72
+111%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-13700F 38902
Xeon w9-3575X 82207
+111%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 25.42 53.72
Recency 4 January 2023 24 August 2024
Physical cores 16 44
Threads 24 88
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 340 Watt

i7-13700F has 423.1% lower power consumption.

Xeon w9-3575X, on the other hand, has a 111.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 175% more physical cores and 266.7% more threads.

The Xeon w9-3575X is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-13700F in performance tests.

Note that Core i7-13700F is a desktop processor while Xeon w9-3575X is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-13700F and Xeon w9-3575X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-13700F
Core i7-13700F
Intel Xeon w9-3575X
Xeon w9-3575X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 450 votes

Rate Core i7-13700F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon w9-3575X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-13700F or Xeon w9-3575X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.