Celeron 6205 vs i7-1068G7
Primary details
Comparing Core i7-1068G7 and Celeron 6205 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1160 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Intel Core i7 | Intel Tiger Lake |
Power efficiency | 18.22 | no data |
Architecture codename | Ice Lake (Client) (2019) | Tiger Lake U (2020) |
Release date | 1 August 2019 (5 years ago) | 1 September 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core i7-1068G7 and Celeron 6205 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 8 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 2.3 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 4.1 GHz | 2/2 GHz |
Bus type | OPI | no data |
Bus rate | 4 × 4 GT/s | no data |
Multiplier | 23 | no data |
L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 160 KB |
L2 cache | 256K (per core) | 2.5 MB |
L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | 4 MB |
Chip lithography | 10 nm | 10 nm |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-1068G7 and Celeron 6205 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
Socket | Intel BGA1440 | BGA1499 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-1068G7 and Celeron 6205. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | + | - |
AVX | + | - |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-1068G7 and Celeron 6205 are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-1068G7 and Celeron 6205. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4 |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 4 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 59.732 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (300 - 1100 MHz) | Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs (400 MHz) |
Pros & cons summary
Integrated graphics card | 5.41 | 4.55 |
Recency | 1 August 2019 | 1 September 2020 |
Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
Threads | 8 | 2 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 15 Watt |
i7-1068G7 has 18.9% faster integrated GPU, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.
Celeron 6205, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 86.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core i7-1068G7 and Celeron 6205. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-1068G7 and Celeron 6205, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.