Phenom II X3 P840 vs i5-750

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-750
2009
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.59
+93.9%
Phenom II X3 P840
2010
3 cores / 3 threads, 25 Watt
0.82

Core i5-750 outperforms Phenom II X3 P840 by an impressive 94% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-750 and Phenom II X3 P840 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20932580
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.14no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesCore i5 (Desktop)3x AMD Phenom II
Power efficiency1.583.10
Architecture codenameLynnfield (2009−2010)Champlain (2010−2011)
Release date8 September 2009 (15 years ago)4 October 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$150no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-750 and Phenom II X3 P840 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)3 (Tri-Core)
Threads43
Base clock speed2.66 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz1.9 GHz
Bus rate2500 MHz3600 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)384 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1.5 MB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size296 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature73 °Cno data
Number of transistors774 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-750 and Phenom II X3 P840 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1156,LGA1156S1
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-750 and Phenom II X3 P840. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Virtualization, AMD64, Advanced Virus Protection, SSE(1,2,3,4a)
VirusProtect-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE36 Bitno data

Security technologies

Core i5-750 and Phenom II X3 P840 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-750 and Phenom II X3 P840 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-750 and Phenom II X3 P840. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-750 and Phenom II X3 P840.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-750 1.59
+93.9%
Phenom II X3 P840 0.82

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i5-750 11048
+150%
Phenom II X3 P840 4425

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

i5-750 12.06
+130%
Phenom II X3 P840 27.7

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.59 0.82
Recency 8 September 2009 4 October 2010
Physical cores 4 3
Threads 4 3
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 25 Watt

i5-750 has a 93.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads.

Phenom II X3 P840, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 280% lower power consumption.

The Core i5-750 is our recommended choice as it beats the Phenom II X3 P840 in performance tests.

Note that Core i5-750 is a desktop processor while Phenom II X3 P840 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-750 and Phenom II X3 P840, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-750
Core i5-750
AMD Phenom II X3 P840
Phenom II X3 P840

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 984 votes

Rate Core i5-750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 21 vote

Rate Phenom II X3 P840 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-750 or Phenom II X3 P840, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.