Phenom II X3 P840 vs A6-3420M
Aggregate performance score
Phenom II X3 P840 outperforms A6-3420M by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing A6-3420M and Phenom II X3 P840 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2556 | 2549 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD A-Series | 3x AMD Phenom II |
| Architecture codename | Llano (2011−2012) | Champlain (2010−2011) |
| Release date | 15 June 2011 (13 years ago) | 4 October 2010 (13 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
A6-3420M and Phenom II X3 P840 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 3 (Tri-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 3 |
| Base clock speed | 1.5 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 1.9 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 3600 MHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 384 KB |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 1.5 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 218 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1000 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on A6-3420M and Phenom II X3 P840 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | FS1 | S1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-3420M and Phenom II X3 P840. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | 3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, Radeon HD 6480G | Virtualization, AMD64, Advanced Virus Protection, SSE(1,2,3,4a) |
| VirusProtect | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-3420M and Phenom II X3 P840 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-3420M and Phenom II X3 P840. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon HD 6520G | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.84 | 0.85 |
| Recency | 15 June 2011 | 4 October 2010 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 3 |
| Threads | 4 | 3 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 25 Watt |
A6-3420M has an age advantage of 8 months, 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.
Phenom II X3 P840, on the other hand, has a 1.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 40% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between A6-3420M and Phenom II X3 P840.
Should you still have questions on choice between A6-3420M and Phenom II X3 P840, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
