Core Ultra 7 165U vs Core i5-13400E
Primary details
Comparing Core i5-13400E and Core Ultra 7 165U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | 660 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Meteor Lake-U |
| Architecture codename | Raptor Lake-S | Meteor Lake-P |
| Release date | 4 January 2023 (1 year ago) | 14 December 2023 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core i5-13400E and Core Ultra 7 165U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 10 (Deca-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 14 |
| Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 1.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.6 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
| L1 cache | 80K (per core) | 112 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 20 MB (shared) | 12 MB |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | 257 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 110 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Core i5-13400E and Core Ultra 7 165U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 1700 | Intel BGA 2049 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-13400E and Core Ultra 7 165U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| TSX | + | + |
Security technologies
Core i5-13400E and Core Ultra 7 165U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-13400E and Core Ultra 7 165U are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-13400E and Core Ultra 7 165U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel | DDR5 |
| ECC memory support | no data | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel UHD Graphics 730 | Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-13400E and Core Ultra 7 165U.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 12 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 4 January 2023 | 14 December 2023 |
| Physical cores | 10 | 12 |
| Threads | 16 | 14 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 15 Watt |
i5-13400E has 14.3% more threads.
Ultra 7 165U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months, 20% more physical cores, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 333.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core i5-13400E and Core Ultra 7 165U. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Core i5-13400E is a desktop processor while Core Ultra 7 165U is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-13400E and Core Ultra 7 165U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
