Ultra 7 165U vs i5-13400

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-13400
2023
10 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
14.66
+31%
Core Ultra 7 165U
2023
12 cores / 14 threads, 15 Watt
11.19

Core i5-13400 outperforms Core Ultra 7 165U by a substantial 31% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-13400 and Core Ultra 7 165U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking487700
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation46.94no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Meteor Lake-U
Power efficiency21.3470.60
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-S (2023−2024)Meteor Lake-P (2023)
Release date4 January 2023 (1 year ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$221$448

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-13400 and Core Ultra 7 165U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads1614
Base clock speed2.5 GHz1.7 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz4.9 GHz
L1 cache80K (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache1.25 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache20 MB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nmIntel 4 nm
Die size257 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C110 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-13400 and Core Ultra 7 165U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1700FCBGA2049
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-13400 and Core Ultra 7 165U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
SIPP-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0--
Deep Learning Boost++
Supported AI Software Frameworks-OpenVINO™, WindowsML, ONNX RT

Security technologies

Core i5-13400 and Core Ultra 7 165U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-13400 and Core Ultra 7 165U are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-13400 and Core Ultra 7 165U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800, DDR4-3200DDR5
Maximum memory size192 GB96 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 730Intel® Graphics
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.55 GHz2 GHz
Execution Units24no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-13400 and Core Ultra 7 165U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported44

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i5-13400 and Core Ultra 7 165U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2160 @ 60Hz4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)
Max resolution over eDP5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz3840x2400 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i5-13400 and Core Ultra 7 165U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212.2
OpenGL4.54.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-13400 and Core Ultra 7 165U.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.04.0
PCI Express lanes1612
PCI supportno data4.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-13400 14.66
+31%
Ultra 7 165U 11.19

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-13400 23286
+31%
Ultra 7 165U 17770

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

i5-13400 2358
+44.1%
Ultra 7 165U 1636

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

i5-13400 257
+7.1%
Ultra 7 165U 240

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

i5-13400 12107
+41.2%
Ultra 7 165U 8577

Blender(-)

i5-13400 206
Ultra 7 165U 323
+56.6%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

i5-13400 1795
+3.5%
Ultra 7 165U 1734

7-Zip Single

i5-13400 5829
+19.1%
Ultra 7 165U 4895

7-Zip

i5-13400 59510
+47.6%
Ultra 7 165U 40306

WebXPRT 3

i5-13400 306
+12.5%
Ultra 7 165U 272

CrossMark Overall

i5-13400 1877
+22.9%
Ultra 7 165U 1528

WebXPRT 4 Overall

i5-13400 251
Ultra 7 165U 254
+1.2%

Blender v3.3 Classroom CPU(-)

i5-13400 336
Ultra 7 165U 643
+91.2%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.66 11.19
Recency 4 January 2023 14 December 2023
Physical cores 10 12
Threads 16 14
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 15 Watt

i5-13400 has a 31% higher aggregate performance score, and 14.3% more threads.

Ultra 7 165U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months, 20% more physical cores, and 333.3% lower power consumption.

The Core i5-13400 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Ultra 7 165U in performance tests.

Note that Core i5-13400 is a desktop processor while Core Ultra 7 165U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-13400 and Core Ultra 7 165U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-13400
Core i5-13400
Intel Core Ultra 7 165U
Core Ultra 7 165U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1091 vote

Rate Core i5-13400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 10 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 165U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-13400 or Core Ultra 7 165U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.