i3-3250 vs i3-9100F

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-9100F and Core i3-3250 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	1366	2117
Place by popularity	40	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	10.00	0.15
Market segment	Desktop processor	Desktop processor
Series	Intel Core i3	no data
Power efficiency	6.17	2.65
Architecture codename	Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release date	23 April 2019 (5 years ago)	9 June 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$122	$138

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i3-9100F has 6567% better value for money than i3-3250.

Detailed specifications

Core i3-9100F and Core i3-3250 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	4	4
Base clock speed	3.6 GHz	3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed	4.2 GHz	3.5 GHz
Bus type	DMI 3.0	no data
Bus rate	4 × 8 GT/s	5 GT/s
Multiplier	36	no data
L1 cache	256 KB	64 KB (per core)
L2 cache	1 MB	256 KB (per core)
L3 cache	6 MB (shared)	3 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	14 nm	22 nm
Die size	126 mm2	94 mm2
Maximum core temperature	100 °C	no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	72 °C	65 °C
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	+	-

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-9100F and Core i3-3250 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1 (Uniprocessor)	1
Socket	FCLGA1151	FCLGA1155
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-9100F and Core i3-3250. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX
AES-NI	+	-
AVX	+	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
My WiFi	no data	+
Turbo Boost Technology	2.0	-
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	+
Idle States	+	+
Thermal Monitoring	+	+
FDI	no data	+

Security technologies

Core i3-9100F and Core i3-3250 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	-	+
EDB	+	+
Secure Key	+	-
MPX	+	-
Identity Protection	+	+
SGX	Yes with Intel® ME	no data
OS Guard	+	no data
Anti-Theft	no data	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-9100F and Core i3-3250 are enumerated here.

AMD-V	+	-
VT-d	+	-
VT-x	+	+
EPT	+	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-9100F and Core i3-3250. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4	DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600
Maximum memory size	64 GB	32 GB
Max memory channels	2	2
Maximum memory bandwidth	38.397 GB/s	25.6 GB/s
ECC memory support	+	-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	-	Intel HD Graphics 2500
Quick Sync Video	-	+
Clear Video HD	-	+
Graphics max frequency	-	1.05 GHz
InTru 3D	-	+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-9100F and Core i3-3250 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported

-

3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-9100F and Core i3-3250.

PCIe version	3.0	2.0
PCI Express lanes	16	16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	4.40	1.60
Recency	23 April 2019	9 June 2013
Physical cores	4	2
Chip lithography	14 nm	22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	55 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-9100F and Core i3-3250, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---