Celeron N2840 vs i3-6300

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-6300
2015
2 cores / 4 threads, 51 Watt
2.72
+635%
Celeron N2840
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 7 Watt
0.37

Core i3-6300 outperforms Celeron N2840 by a whopping 635% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-6300 and Celeron N2840 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking17063041
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.63no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i3Intel Celeron
Power efficiency5.055.00
Architecture codenameSkylake (2015−2016)Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Release date1 September 2015 (9 years ago)22 May 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$147no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-6300 and Celeron N2840 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.8 GHz2.16 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz2.58 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier38no data
L1 cache128 KB56K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB512K (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Die size98.57 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)65 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-6300 and Celeron N2840 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA1151FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)51 Watt7.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-6300 and Celeron N2840. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Connectno data+

Security technologies

Core i3-6300 and Celeron N2840 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-6300 and Celeron N2840 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-6300 and Celeron N2840. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3
Maximum memory size64 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/s21.32 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 530Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+-
Graphics max frequency1.15 GHz792 MHz
InTru 3D+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-6300 and Celeron N2840 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported32
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i3-6300 and Celeron N2840 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGAN/Ano data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i3-6300 and Celeron N2840 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-6300 and Celeron N2840.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes164
USB revisionno data3.0 and 2.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-6300 2.72
+635%
Celeron N2840 0.37

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-6300 4322
+635%
Celeron N2840 588

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i3-6300 1263
+610%
Celeron N2840 178

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i3-6300 2536
+754%
Celeron N2840 297

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.72 0.37
Integrated graphics card 2.60 0.77
Recency 1 September 2015 22 May 2014
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 51 Watt 7 Watt

i3-6300 has a 635.1% higher aggregate performance score, 237.7% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more threads, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron N2840, on the other hand, has 628.6% lower power consumption.

The Core i3-6300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N2840 in performance tests.

Note that Core i3-6300 is a desktop processor while Celeron N2840 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-6300 and Celeron N2840, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-6300
Core i3-6300
Intel Celeron N2840
Celeron N2840

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 176 votes

Rate Core i3-6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 660 votes

Rate Celeron N2840 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-6300 or Celeron N2840, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.