Xeon w9-3495X vs Athlon 64 X2 4000+

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 64 X2 4000+
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 89 Watt
0.44
Xeon w9-3495X
2023
56 cores / 112 threads, 350 Watt
57.83
+13043%

Xeon w9-3495X outperforms Athlon 64 X2 4000+ by a whopping 13043% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 X2 4000+ and Xeon w9-3495X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking296220
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data18.76
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency0.4715.64
Architecture codenameWindsor (2006−2007)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release dateMay 2006 (18 years ago)15 February 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$5,889

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 X2 4000+ and Xeon w9-3495X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)56 (Hexapentaconta-Core)
Threads2112
Base clock speedno data1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz4.8 GHz
L1 cache256 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K2 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB105 MB
Chip lithography90 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size220 mm24x 477 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data81 °C
Number of transistors154 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 X2 4000+ and Xeon w9-3495X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM2FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)89 Watt350 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 X2 4000+ and Xeon w9-3495X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Athlon 64 X2 4000+ and Xeon w9-3495X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 X2 4000+ and Xeon w9-3495X are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 X2 4000+ and Xeon w9-3495X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 64 X2 4000+ and Xeon w9-3495X.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data112

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon 64 X2 4000+ 0.44
Xeon w9-3495X 57.83
+13043%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon 64 X2 4000+ 692
Xeon w9-3495X 91866
+13175%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Athlon 64 X2 4000+ 195
Xeon w9-3495X 2110
+982%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Athlon 64 X2 4000+ 363
Xeon w9-3495X 18543
+5008%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.44 57.83
Physical cores 2 56
Threads 2 112
Power consumption (TDP) 89 Watt 350 Watt

Athlon 64 X2 4000+ has 293.3% lower power consumption.

Xeon w9-3495X, on the other hand, has a 13043.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 2700% more physical cores and 5500% more threads.

The Xeon w9-3495X is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 X2 4000+ in performance tests.

Note that Athlon 64 X2 4000+ is a desktop processor while Xeon w9-3495X is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 X2 4000+ and Xeon w9-3495X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 X2 4000+
Athlon 64 X2 4000+
Intel Xeon w9-3495X
Xeon w9-3495X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 191 vote

Rate Athlon 64 X2 4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 177 votes

Rate Xeon w9-3495X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 X2 4000+ or Xeon w9-3495X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.