Athlon II X2 270u vs i3-550

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-550 and Athlon II X2 270u processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2446not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.06no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.31no data
Architecture codenameClarkdale (2010−2011)Regor (2009−2013)
Release date30 May 2010 (14 years ago)21 September 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$101$68

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-550 and Athlon II X2 270u basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz2 GHz
Bus rate2.5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size81 mm2117 mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °Cno data
Number of transistors382 million410 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-550 and Athlon II X2 270u compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1156AM3
Power consumption (TDP)73 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-550 and Athlon II X2 270u. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI+no data

Security technologies

Core i3-550 and Athlon II X2 270u technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-550 and Athlon II X2 270u are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-550 and Athlon II X2 270u. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR2, DDR3
Maximum memory size16.38 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® Processorsno data
Clear Video HD+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-550 and Athlon II X2 270u integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-550 and Athlon II X2 270u.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-550 1610
+139%
Athlon II X2 270u 675

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 May 2010 21 September 2010
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 73 Watt 25 Watt

i3-550 has 100% more threads, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon II X2 270u, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 months, and 192% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core i3-550 and Athlon II X2 270u. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-550 and Athlon II X2 270u, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-550
Core i3-550
AMD Athlon II X2 270u
Athlon II X2 270u

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 424 votes

Rate Core i3-550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 8 votes

Rate Athlon II X2 270u on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-550 or Athlon II X2 270u, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.