Atom x5-Z8500 vs Core i3-4000M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-4000M
2013
2 cores / 4 threads, 37 Watt
1.15
+43.8%

i3-4000M outperforms Atom x5-Z8500 by a considerable 44% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-4000M and Atom x5-Z8500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking23022538
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i35x Intel Atom
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Cherry Trail (2016)
Release date4 June 2013 (11 years ago)2 March 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$225no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-4000M and Atom x5-Z8500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.4 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz1.44 GHz
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache512 KB2 MB
L3 cache3 MB0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size130 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C90 °C
Number of transistors960 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-4000M and Atom x5-Z8500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketrPGAno data
Power consumption (TDP)37 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-4000M and Atom x5-Z8500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NIno data+
AVX+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-4000M and Atom x5-Z8500 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-4000M and Atom x5-Z8500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s25.6 GB/s
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 4600Intel HD Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-4000M and Atom x5-Z8500.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanes162

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-4000M 1.15
+43.8%
Atom x5-Z8500 0.80

Core i3-4000M outperforms Atom x5-Z8500 by 44% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i3-4000M 1779
+43.9%
Atom x5-Z8500 1236

Core i3-4000M outperforms Atom x5-Z8500 by 44% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 41%

i3-4000M 711
+318%
Atom x5-Z8500 170

Core i3-4000M outperforms Atom x5-Z8500 by 318% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 41%

i3-4000M 1432
+193%
Atom x5-Z8500 489

Core i3-4000M outperforms Atom x5-Z8500 by 193% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i3-4000M 3581
+207%
Atom x5-Z8500 1166

Core i3-4000M outperforms Atom x5-Z8500 by 207% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i3-4000M 8042
+126%
Atom x5-Z8500 3563

Core i3-4000M outperforms Atom x5-Z8500 by 126% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

i3-4000M 3098
+55.6%
Atom x5-Z8500 1991

Core i3-4000M outperforms Atom x5-Z8500 by 56% in 3DMark06 CPU.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

i3-4000M 3
+97%
Atom x5-Z8500 1

Core i3-4000M outperforms Atom x5-Z8500 by 97% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

i3-4000M 240
+125%
Atom x5-Z8500 107

Core i3-4000M outperforms Atom x5-Z8500 by 125% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

i3-4000M 95
+168%
Atom x5-Z8500 36

Core i3-4000M outperforms Atom x5-Z8500 by 168% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

i3-4000M 1.06
+147%
Atom x5-Z8500 0.43

Core i3-4000M outperforms Atom x5-Z8500 by 147% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 12%

i3-4000M 15
+110%
Atom x5-Z8500 7

Core i3-4000M outperforms Atom x5-Z8500 by 110% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 12%

i3-4000M 79
+116%
Atom x5-Z8500 37

Core i3-4000M outperforms Atom x5-Z8500 by 116% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

i3-4000M 4298
+75.1%
Atom x5-Z8500 2455

Core i3-4000M outperforms Atom x5-Z8500 by 75% in Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core.

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

i3-4000M 2024
+136%
Atom x5-Z8500 859

Core i3-4000M outperforms Atom x5-Z8500 by 136% in Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.15 0.80
Recency 4 June 2013 2 March 2015
Physical cores 2 4
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm

i3-4000M has a 43.8% higher aggregate performance score.

Atom x5-Z8500, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more physical cores, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

The Core i3-4000M is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom x5-Z8500 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-4000M and Atom x5-Z8500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-4000M
Core i3-4000M
Intel Atom x5-Z8500
Atom x5-Z8500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 209 votes

Rate Core i3-4000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 15 votes

Rate Atom x5-Z8500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-4000M or Atom x5-Z8500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.