i7-660UM vs i3-350M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-350M
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
0.70
Core i7-660UM
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 18 Watt
0.83
+18.6%

i7-660UM outperforms i3-350M by a moderate 19% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-350M and Core i7-660UM processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking26832559
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i3Intel Core i7
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Arrandale (2010−2011)
Release date7 January 2010 (14 years ago)7 January 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$130$317

Detailed specifications

Core i3-350M and Core i7-660UM basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.26 GHz1.33 GHz
Boost clock speed0.07 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0DMI 1.0
Bus rate1 × 2.5 GT/s1 × 2.5 GT/s
Multiplier1710
L1 cache128 KB128 KB
L2 cache512 KB512 KB
L3 cache3 MB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size81+114 mm281+144 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C for rPGA, 105 °C for BGA105 °C
Number of transistors382+177 Million382+177 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-350M and Core i7-660UM compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketBGA1288,PGA988BGA1288
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-350M and Core i7-660UM. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI-+
FMA++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-+
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
PAE36 Bit36 Bit
FDI++
Fast Memory Access++
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Core i3-350M and Core i7-660UM technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-350M and Core i7-660UM are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-350M and Core i7-660UM. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-800
Maximum memory size8 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth17.051 GB/s12.799 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® ProcessorsIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® Processors
Clear Video++
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency667 MHz500 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-350M and Core i7-660UM integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported22

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-350M and Core i7-660UM.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-350M 0.70
i7-660UM 0.83
+18.6%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-350M 1086
i7-660UM 1284
+18.2%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.70 0.83
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 18 Watt

i7-660UM has a 18.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 94.4% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-660UM is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-350M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-350M and Core i7-660UM, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-350M
Core i3-350M
Intel Core i7-660UM
Core i7-660UM

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 255 votes

Rate Core i3-350M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core i7-660UM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-350M or Core i7-660UM, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.