Athlon 64 X2 4800+ vs Core 2 Duo P9500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo P9500
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 25 Watt
0.63
+46.5%
Athlon 64 X2 4800+
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.43

Core 2 Duo P9500 outperforms Athlon 64 X2 4800+ by a considerable 47% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo P9500 and Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4800+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27882977
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core 2 Duo2x Athlon 64 (Desktop)
Power efficiency2.380.63
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Windsor (2006−2007)
Release date15 July 2008 (16 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$348no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo P9500 and Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4800+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.53 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.53 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus rate1066 MHz1000 MHz
L1 cache128 KB256K
L2 cache6 MB512K
L3 cache6 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm90 nm
Die size107 mm2220 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 Million233 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo P9500 and Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4800+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGA479,PBGA479,PGA478939
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo P9500 and Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4800+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo P9500 and Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4800+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo P9500 and Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4800+ are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo P9500 0.63
+46.5%
Athlon 64 X2 4800+ 0.43

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo P9500 993
+46.2%
Athlon 64 X2 4800+ 679

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Core 2 Duo P9500 2311
+28.5%
Athlon 64 X2 4800+ 1798

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.63 0.43
Chip lithography 45 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 65 Watt

Core 2 Duo P9500 has a 46.5% higher aggregate performance score, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 160% lower power consumption.

The Core 2 Duo P9500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 X2 4800+ in performance tests.

Be aware that Core 2 Duo P9500 is a notebook processor while Athlon 64 X2 4800+ is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo P9500 and Athlon 64 X2 4800+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo P9500
Core 2 Duo P9500
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+
Athlon 64 X2 4800+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 6 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo P9500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 76 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 4800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo P9500 or Athlon 64 X2 4800+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.