E2-3000 vs i3-3217UE

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-3217UE
2012
2 cores / 4 threads, 17 Watt
0.86
+87%
E2-3000
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.46

Core i3-3217UE outperforms E2-3000 by an impressive 87% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-3217UE and E2-3000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25572926
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD E-Series
Power efficiency4.792.90
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Kabini (2013−2014)
Release date1 August 2012 (12 years ago)23 May 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core i3-3217UE and E2-3000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz1.65 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1024 KB
L3 cache3 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm28 nm
Die size118 mm2246 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data90 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-3217UE and E2-3000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketIntel BGA1023FT3
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-3217UE and E2-3000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX
AES-NI-+
FMA-FMA4
AVX++
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-3217UE and E2-3000 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-3217UE and E2-3000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesunknown Dual-channelDDR3
Max memory channelsno data1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD 4000AMD Radeon HD 8280
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-3217UE and E2-3000 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i3-3217UE and E2-3000 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-3217UE and E2-3000.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-3217UE 0.86
+87%
E2-3000 0.46

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-3217UE 1362
+87.6%
E2-3000 726

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.86 0.46
Recency 1 August 2012 23 May 2013
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 22 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 15 Watt

i3-3217UE has a 87% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more threads, and a 27.3% more advanced lithography process.

E2-3000, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 months, and 13.3% lower power consumption.

The Core i3-3217UE is our recommended choice as it beats the E2-3000 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-3217UE and E2-3000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-3217UE
Core i3-3217UE
AMD E2-3000
E2-3000

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 3 votes

Rate Core i3-3217UE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 26 votes

Rate E2-3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-3217UE or E2-3000, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.