Celeron 1005M vs i3-2310E

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-2310E
2011
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.16
+65.7%
Celeron 1005M
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.70

Core i3-2310E outperforms Celeron 1005M by an impressive 66% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-2310E and Celeron 1005M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking23662704
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i3Intel Celeron
Power efficiency3.141.89
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release date1 February 2011 (13 years ago)1 July 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$225$86

Detailed specifications

Core i3-2310E and Celeron 1005M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.1 GHz1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz1.9 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/s5 GT/s
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache64K (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)512 KB
L3 cache3 MB (shared)2 MB
Chip lithography32 nm22 nm
Die size149 mm294 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors624 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-2310E and Celeron 1005M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketIntel BGA1023FCPGA988
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-2310E and Celeron 1005M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFino data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Core i3-2310E and Celeron 1005M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-2310E and Celeron 1005M are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-2310E and Celeron 1005M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size16 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/s25.6 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 3000Intel HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel Processors
Graphics max frequencyno data1 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-2310E and Celeron 1005M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
SDVOno data+
CRTno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-2310E and Celeron 1005M.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-2310E 1.16
+65.7%
Celeron 1005M 0.70

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-2310E 1845
+66.5%
Celeron 1005M 1108

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.16 0.70
Integrated graphics card 0.66 0.77
Recency 1 February 2011 1 July 2013
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 22 nm

i3-2310E has a 65.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more threads.

Celeron 1005M, on the other hand, has 16.7% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 45.5% more advanced lithography process.

The Core i3-2310E is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 1005M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-2310E and Celeron 1005M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-2310E
Core i3-2310E
Intel Celeron 1005M
Celeron 1005M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 3 votes

Rate Core i3-2310E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 251 vote

Rate Celeron 1005M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-2310E or Celeron 1005M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.