Ultra 9 285H vs Ultra 9 285K

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core Ultra 9 285K
2024
24 cores / 24 threads, 125 Watt
43.06
+102%
Core Ultra 9 285H
16 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
21.27

Core Ultra 9 285K outperforms Core Ultra 9 285H by a whopping 102% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core Ultra 9 285K and Core Ultra 9 285H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking53257
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation74.28no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Power efficiency32.4444.50
Architecture codenameArrow Lake-S (2024−2025)Arrow Lake-H
Release date24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$589no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra 9 285K and Core Ultra 9 285H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads2416
Base clock speed3.7 GHzno data
Boost clock speed5.7 GHz5.4 GHz
Bus rate250 MHzno data
L1 cache112 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache3 MB (per core)no data
L3 cache36 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography3 nmno data
Die size243 mm2no data
Number of transistors17,800 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 9 285K and Core Ultra 9 285H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
Socket1851no data
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 9 285K and Core Ultra 9 285H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+-

Security technologies

Core Ultra 9 285K and Core Ultra 9 285H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 9 285K and Core Ultra 9 285H are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 9 285K and Core Ultra 9 285H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5 Depends on motherboardno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardArc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EUno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 9 285K and Core Ultra 9 285H.

PCIe version5.0no data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ultra 9 285K 43.06
+102%
Ultra 9 285H 21.27

Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core

Ultra 9 285K 21598
+40.9%
Ultra 9 285H 15330

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 43.06 21.27
Physical cores 24 16
Threads 24 16
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 45 Watt

Ultra 9 285K has a 102.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

Ultra 9 285H, on the other hand, has 177.8% lower power consumption.

The Core Ultra 9 285K is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Ultra 9 285H in performance tests.

Note that Core Ultra 9 285K is a desktop processor while Core Ultra 9 285H is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Ultra 9 285K and Core Ultra 9 285H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
Core Ultra 9 285K
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
Core Ultra 9 285H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 159 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 285K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Core Ultra 9 285H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Ultra 9 285K or Core Ultra 9 285H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.