Ultra 7 258V vs Ultra 9 285K

Aggregate performance score

Core Ultra 9 285K
2024
24 cores / 24 threads, 125 Watt
43.30
+248%
Core Ultra 7 258V
2024
8 cores / 8 threads, 17 Watt
12.45

Core Ultra 9 285K outperforms Core Ultra 7 258V by a whopping 248% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core Ultra 9 285K and Core Ultra 7 258V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking50614
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation70.87no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Power efficiency32.7869.31
Architecture codenameArrow Lake-S (2024−2025)Lunar Lake (2024)
Release date24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$589no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra 9 285K and Core Ultra 7 258V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads248
Base clock speed3.7 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed5.7 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus rate250 MHz37 MHz
L1 cache112 KB (per core)192 KB (per core)
L2 cache3 MB (per core)2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cache36 MB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography3 nm3 nm
Die size243 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors17,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 9 285K and Core Ultra 7 258V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket1851Intel BGA 2833
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 9 285K and Core Ultra 7 258V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
TSX++

Security technologies

Core Ultra 9 285K and Core Ultra 7 258V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 9 285K and Core Ultra 7 258V are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 9 285K and Core Ultra 7 258V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5 Depends on motherboardDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardArc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EUArc 140V

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 9 285K and Core Ultra 7 258V.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes204

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ultra 9 285K 43.30
+248%
Ultra 7 258V 12.45

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ultra 9 285K 68775
+248%
Ultra 7 258V 19773

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ultra 9 285K 25963
+172%
Ultra 7 258V 9540

Blender(-)

Ultra 9 285K 79
Ultra 7 258V 374
+373%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ultra 9 285K 2388
+21%
Ultra 7 258V 1973

7-Zip Single

Ultra 9 285K 7366
+29.9%
Ultra 7 258V 5670

7-Zip

Ultra 9 285K 129706
+279%
Ultra 7 258V 34255

WebXPRT 3

Ultra 9 285K 387
+43.6%
Ultra 7 258V 270

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 43.30 12.45
Physical cores 24 8
Threads 24 8
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 17 Watt

Ultra 9 285K has a 247.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

Ultra 7 258V, on the other hand, has 635.3% lower power consumption.

The Core Ultra 9 285K is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Ultra 7 258V in performance tests.

Note that Core Ultra 9 285K is a desktop processor while Core Ultra 7 258V is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Ultra 9 285K and Core Ultra 7 258V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
Core Ultra 9 285K
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
Core Ultra 7 258V

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 117 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 285K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 12 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 258V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Ultra 9 285K or Core Ultra 7 258V, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.