Ultra 9 285K vs Ultra 7 155H

Aggregate performance score

Core Ultra 7 155H
2023
16 cores / 22 threads, 28 Watt
15.78
Core Ultra 9 285K
2024
24 cores / 24 threads, 125 Watt
43.31
+174%

Core Ultra 9 285K outperforms Core Ultra 7 155H by a whopping 174% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core Ultra 7 155H and Core Ultra 9 285K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking42549
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data70.90
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Meteor Lake-Hno data
Power efficiency53.3332.79
Architecture codenameMeteor Lake-H (2023)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$503$589

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra 7 155H and Core Ultra 9 285K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads2224
Base clock speed3.8 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed4.8 GHz5.7 GHz
Bus rateno data250 MHz
L1 cache112 KB (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)3 MB (per core)
L3 cache24 MB (shared)36 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 4 nm3 nm
Die sizeno data243 mm2
Maximum core temperature110 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data17,800 million
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 7 155H and Core Ultra 9 285K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA20491851
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Core Ultra 9 285K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX++
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost+-
Supported AI Software FrameworksOpenVINO™, WindowsML, ONNX RT-

Security technologies

Core Ultra 7 155H and Core Ultra 9 285K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Core Ultra 9 285K are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Core Ultra 9 285K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5 Depends on motherboard
Maximum memory size96 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® Arc™ graphicsArc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency2.25 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core Ultra 7 155H and Core Ultra 9 285K integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Core Ultra 9 285K integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)no data
Max resolution over eDP3840x2400 @ 120Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Core Ultra 9 285K integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.2no data
OpenGL4.6no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Core Ultra 9 285K.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes820
PCI support5.0 and 4.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ultra 7 155H 15.78
Ultra 9 285K 43.31
+174%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ultra 7 155H 25058
Ultra 9 285K 68800
+175%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ultra 7 155H 12174
Ultra 9 285K 25963
+113%

Blender(-)

Ultra 7 155H 222
+181%
Ultra 9 285K 79

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ultra 7 155H 1764
Ultra 9 285K 2388
+35.4%

7-Zip Single

Ultra 7 155H 5398
Ultra 9 285K 7366
+36.5%

7-Zip

Ultra 7 155H 60595
Ultra 9 285K 129706
+114%

WebXPRT 3

Ultra 7 155H 278
Ultra 9 285K 387
+39.2%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.78 43.31
Recency 14 December 2023 24 October 2024
Physical cores 16 24
Threads 22 24
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 125 Watt

Ultra 7 155H has 346.4% lower power consumption.

Ultra 9 285K, on the other hand, has a 174.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 months, and 50% more physical cores and 9.1% more threads.

The Core Ultra 9 285K is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Ultra 7 155H in performance tests.

Be aware that Core Ultra 7 155H is a notebook processor while Core Ultra 9 285K is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Ultra 7 155H and Core Ultra 9 285K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
Core Ultra 7 155H
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
Core Ultra 9 285K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 522 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 155H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 103 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 285K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Ultra 7 155H or Core Ultra 9 285K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.