Xeon Platinum 8368Q vs Ultra 7 155H

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core Ultra 7 155H
2023
16 cores / 22 threads, 28 Watt
15.82
Xeon Platinum 8368Q
2021
38 cores / 76 threads, 270 Watt
29.39
+85.8%

Xeon Platinum 8368Q outperforms Core Ultra 7 155H by an impressive 86% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core Ultra 7 155H and Xeon Platinum 8368Q processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking433148
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Meteor Lake-Hno data
Power efficiency53.4710.30
Architecture codenameMeteor Lake-H (2023)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date14 December 2023 (1 year ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$503no data

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra 7 155H and Xeon Platinum 8368Q basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)38
Threads2276
Base clock speed3.8 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4.8 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache112 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache24 MB (shared)57 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature110 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data85 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 7 155H and Xeon Platinum 8368Q compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketIntel BGA 2049FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt270 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Xeon Platinum 8368Q. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX++
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core Ultra 7 155H and Xeon Platinum 8368Q technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Xeon Platinum 8368Q are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Xeon Platinum 8368Q. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data6 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel Arc 8-Cores iGPU ( - 2250 MHz)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Xeon Platinum 8368Q.

PCIe version5.04.0
PCI Express lanes864

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ultra 7 155H 15.82
Xeon Platinum 8368Q 29.39
+85.8%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ultra 7 155H 25131
Xeon Platinum 8368Q 46681
+85.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.82 29.39
Recency 14 December 2023 6 April 2021
Physical cores 16 38
Threads 22 76
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 270 Watt

Ultra 7 155H has an age advantage of 2 years, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 864.3% lower power consumption.

Xeon Platinum 8368Q, on the other hand, has a 85.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 137.5% more physical cores and 245.5% more threads.

The Xeon Platinum 8368Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Ultra 7 155H in performance tests.

Be aware that Core Ultra 7 155H is a notebook processor while Xeon Platinum 8368Q is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Ultra 7 155H and Xeon Platinum 8368Q, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
Core Ultra 7 155H
Intel Xeon Platinum 8368Q
Xeon Platinum 8368Q

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 561 vote

Rate Core Ultra 7 155H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 4 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8368Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Ultra 7 155H or Xeon Platinum 8368Q, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.