Celeron N5095A vs Ultra 7 155H

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core Ultra 7 155H
2023
16 cores / 22 threads, 28 Watt
15.83
+511%
Celeron N5095A
2021
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.59

Core Ultra 7 155H outperforms Celeron N5095A by a whopping 511% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron N5095A processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking4241722
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Meteor Lake-Hno data
Power efficiency53.5016.34
Architecture codenameMeteor Lake-H (2023)Jasper Lake (2021)
Release date14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)1 July 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$503no data

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron N5095A basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads224
Base clock speed3.8 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.8 GHz2.9 GHz
L1 cache112 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache2 MB (per core)1.5 MB
L3 cache24 MB (shared)4 MB
Chip lithographyIntel 4 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature110 °C105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron N5095A compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA2049BGA1338
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron N5095A. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
AVX+-
vPro+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX+-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
Smart Responseno data-
GPIOno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+-
Deep Learning Boost+-
Supported AI Software FrameworksOpenVINO™, WindowsML, ONNX RT-

Security technologies

Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron N5095A technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection-+
SGXno data-
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron N5095A are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron N5095A. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4
Maximum memory size96 GB16 GB
Max memory channels22

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® Arc™ graphicsIntel UHD Graphics
Quick Sync Video++
Graphics max frequency2.25 GHz750 MHz
Execution Unitsno data16

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron N5095A integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported43
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron N5095A integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over eDP3840x2400 @ 120Hz4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz4096x2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron N5095A integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.212
OpenGL4.64.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron N5095A.

PCIe version5.0no data
PCI Express lanes88
PCI support5.0 and 4.0no data
USB revisionno data2.0/3.2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data14
Integrated LANno data-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ultra 7 155H 15.83
+511%
Celeron N5095A 2.59

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ultra 7 155H 25141
+511%
Celeron N5095A 4116

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.83 2.59
Recency 14 December 2023 1 July 2021
Physical cores 16 4
Threads 22 4
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 15 Watt

Ultra 7 155H has a 511.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and 300% more physical cores and 450% more threads.

Celeron N5095A, on the other hand, has 86.7% lower power consumption.

The Core Ultra 7 155H is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N5095A in performance tests.

Be aware that Core Ultra 7 155H is a notebook processor while Celeron N5095A is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron N5095A, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
Core Ultra 7 155H
Intel Celeron N5095A
Celeron N5095A

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 528 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 155H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 99 votes

Rate Celeron N5095A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Ultra 7 155H or Celeron N5095A, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.