Phenom X4 9850 (95W) vs Solo T1400
Primary details
Comparing Core Solo T1400 and Phenom X4 9850 (95W) processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Core Solo | no data |
| Architecture codename | Yonah (2005−2006) | Agena (2007−2008) |
| Release date | January 2006 (18 years ago) | October 2008 (16 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core Solo T1400 and Phenom X4 9850 (95W) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 1.83 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1.83 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| Bus rate | 667 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 2 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 90 mm2 | 285 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 151 million | 450 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 1.1625V - 1.3V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core Solo T1400 and Phenom X4 9850 (95W) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | PPGA478, PBGA479 | AM2+ |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 27 Watt | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Solo T1400 and Phenom X4 9850 (95W). You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| PAE | 32 Bit | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Core Solo T1400 and Phenom X4 9850 (95W) technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Solo T1400 and Phenom X4 9850 (95W) are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-x | - | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Solo T1400 and Phenom X4 9850 (95W). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 4 |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 27 Watt | 95 Watt |
Solo T1400 has 251.9% lower power consumption.
Phenom X4 9850 (95W), on the other hand, has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Core Solo T1400 and Phenom X4 9850 (95W). We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Core Solo T1400 is a notebook processor while Phenom X4 9850 (95W) is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core Solo T1400 and Phenom X4 9850 (95W), ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
