i9-13900KF vs Solo T1400

Aggregate performance score

Core Solo T1400
2006
1 core / 1 thread, 27 Watt
0.16
Core i9-13900KF
2022
24 cores / 32 threads, 125 Watt
36.70
+22838%

Core i9-13900KF outperforms Core Solo T1400 by a whopping 22838% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core Solo T1400 and Core i9-13900KF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking328593
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data64.61
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesCore SoloIntel Core i9
Power efficiency0.5613.73
Architecture codenameYonah (2005−2006)Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)
Release dateJanuary 2006 (18 years ago)27 September 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$564

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core Solo T1400 and Core i9-13900KF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads132
Base clock speed1.83 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed1.83 GHz5.7 GHz
Bus rate667 MHz4 × 16 GT/s
Multiplierno data30
L1 cache64 KB80K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size90 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors151 millionno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+
VID voltage range1.1625V - 1.3Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core Solo T1400 and Core i9-13900KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketPPGA478, PBGA479FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)27 Watt125 W, 253 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Solo T1400 and Core i9-13900KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States-+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
FSB parity-no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core Solo T1400 and Core i9-13900KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Solo T1400 and Core i9-13900KF are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x-+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Solo T1400 and Core i9-13900KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data192 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data89.604 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Solo T1400 and Core i9-13900KF.

PCIe versionno data5.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Solo T1400 0.16
i9-13900KF 36.70
+22838%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Solo T1400 253
i9-13900KF 58304
+22945%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.16 36.70
Physical cores 1 24
Threads 1 32
Power consumption (TDP) 27 Watt 125 Watt

Solo T1400 has 363% lower power consumption.

i9-13900KF, on the other hand, has a 22837.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 2300% more physical cores and 3100% more threads.

The Core i9-13900KF is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Solo T1400 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core Solo T1400 is a notebook processor while Core i9-13900KF is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Solo T1400 and Core i9-13900KF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Solo T1400
Core Solo T1400
Intel Core i9-13900KF
Core i9-13900KF

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 5 votes

Rate Core Solo T1400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 634 votes

Rate Core i9-13900KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Solo T1400 or Core i9-13900KF, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.