i9-13900F vs Solo T1400
Aggregate performance score
Core i9-13900F outperforms Core Solo T1400 by a whopping 19669% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core Solo T1400 and Core i9-13900F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3299 | 128 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 56.85 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Core Solo | no data |
| Power efficiency | 0.56 | 46.31 |
| Architecture codename | Yonah (2005−2006) | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) |
| Release date | January 2006 (19 years ago) | 4 January 2023 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $524 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core Solo T1400 and Core i9-13900F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) |
| Performance-cores | no data | 8 |
| Efficient-cores | no data | 16 |
| Threads | 1 | 32 |
| Base clock speed | 1.83 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.83 GHz | 5.5 GHz |
| Bus rate | 667 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | 80K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 36 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Die size | 90 mm2 | 257 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 100 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 72 °C |
| Number of transistors | 151 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| VID voltage range | 1.1625V - 1.3V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core Solo T1400 and Core i9-13900F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | PPGA478, PBGA479 | FCLGA1700 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 27 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Solo T1400 and Core i9-13900F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Idle States | - | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| PAE | 32 Bit | no data |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | + |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Core Solo T1400 and Core i9-13900F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | + |
| EDB | + | + |
| Secure Key | no data | + |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Solo T1400 and Core i9-13900F are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | - | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Solo T1400 and Core i9-13900F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1 | DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 192 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 89.6 GB/s |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Solo T1400 and Core i9-13900F.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 and 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 20 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.16 | 31.63 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 24 |
| Threads | 1 | 32 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 27 Watt | 65 Watt |
Solo T1400 has 140.7% lower power consumption.
i9-13900F, on the other hand, has a 19668.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 2300% more physical cores and 3100% more threads.
The Core i9-13900F is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Solo T1400 in performance tests.
Be aware that Core Solo T1400 is a notebook processor while Core i9-13900F is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core Solo T1400 and Core i9-13900F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
