EPYC 7232P vs Solo T1350

Primary details

Comparing Core Solo T1350 and EPYC 7232P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated694
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data9.89
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesCore SoloAMD EPYC
Power efficiencyno data8.80
Architecture codenameYonah (2005−2006)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release dateJanuary 2006 (18 years ago)7 August 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$450

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core Solo T1350 and EPYC 7232P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads116
Base clock speed1.86 GHz3.1 GHz
Boost clock speed1.86 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus rate533 MHzno data
Multiplierno data31
L1 cache64 KB96K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size90 mm2192 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors151 million4,800 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+
VID voltage range0.95V-1.262Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core Solo T1350 and EPYC 7232P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketPPGA478TR4
Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Solo T1350 and EPYC 7232P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core Solo T1350 and EPYC 7232P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Solo T1350 and EPYC 7232P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Solo T1350 and EPYC 7232P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Solo T1350 194
EPYC 7232P 17731
+9040%

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 8
Threads 1 16
Chip lithography 65 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt 120 Watt

Solo T1350 has 287.1% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7232P, on the other hand, has 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Core Solo T1350 and EPYC 7232P. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Core Solo T1350 is a notebook processor while EPYC 7232P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Solo T1350 and EPYC 7232P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Solo T1350
Core Solo T1350
AMD EPYC 7232P
EPYC 7232P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 6 votes

Rate Core Solo T1350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.3 125 votes

Rate EPYC 7232P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Solo T1350 or EPYC 7232P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.