Celeron M ULV 743 vs Solo T1350

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core Solo T1350 and Celeron M ULV 743 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3355not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCore Solono data
Power efficiency0.42no data
Architecture codenameYonah (2005−2006)no data
Release dateJanuary 2006 (18 years ago)1 July 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core Solo T1350 and Celeron M ULV 743 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)no data
Threads1no data
Base clock speed1.86 GHz1.3 GHz
Boost clock speed1.86 GHzno data
Bus rate533 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KBno data
L2 cache2 MBno data
L3 cache0 KB1 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography65 nm45 nm
Die size90 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Number of transistors151 millionno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.95V-1.262Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core Solo T1350 and Celeron M ULV 743 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketPPGA478BGA956
Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Solo T1350 and Celeron M ULV 743. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core Solo T1350 and Celeron M ULV 743 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Solo T1350 and Celeron M ULV 743 are enumerated here.

VT-x--

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Solo T1350 and Celeron M ULV 743. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1no data

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 65 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt 10 Watt

Celeron M ULV 743 has a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 210% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core Solo T1350 and Celeron M ULV 743. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Solo T1350 and Celeron M ULV 743, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Solo T1350
Core Solo T1350
Intel Celeron M ULV 743
Celeron M ULV 743

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 6 votes

Rate Core Solo T1350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate Celeron M ULV 743 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Solo T1350 or Celeron M ULV 743, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.