i5-9400F vs Solo T1200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Core Solo T1200 and Core i5-9400F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated1073
Place by popularitynot in top-10038
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data10.06
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesCore SoloIntel Core i5
Architecture codenameYonah (2005−2006)Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)
Release dateJanuary 2006 (18 years ago)7 January 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$182

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core Solo T1200 and Core i5-9400F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads16
Base clock speedno data2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz4.1 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rate667 MHz4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data29
L1 cache64 KB385 KB
L2 cache2 MB1.5 MB
L3 cache0 KB9 MB
Chip lithography65 nm14 nm
Die size90 mm2149 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors151 millionno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Core Solo T1200 and Core i5-9400F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
Socket479FCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)27 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Solo T1200 and Core i5-9400F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Statusno dataDiscontinued

Security technologies

Core Solo T1200 and Core i5-9400F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Solo T1200 and Core i5-9400F are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Solo T1200 and Core i5-9400F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1DDR4-2666
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data42.671 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Solo T1200 and Core i5-9400F.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Solo T1200 116
i5-9400F 6.76
+1616%

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 6
Threads 1 6
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 27 Watt 65 Watt

Solo T1200 has 140.7% lower power consumption.

i5-9400F, on the other hand, has 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Core Solo T1200 and Core i5-9400F. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Core Solo T1200 is a notebook processor while Core i5-9400F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Solo T1200 and Core i5-9400F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Solo T1200
Core Solo T1200
Intel Core i5-9400F
Core i5-9400F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.5 2 votes

Rate Core Solo T1200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.9 56426 votes

Rate Core i5-9400F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Solo T1200 or Core i5-9400F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.