i5-9400F vs Celeron M 430

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 430 and Core i5-9400F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated1088
Place by popularitynot in top-10024
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data9.69
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesCeleron MIntel Core i5
Power efficiencyno data8.68
Architecture codenameYonah (2005−2006)Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)7 January 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$182

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 430 and Core i5-9400F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads16
Base clock speed1.73 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed1.73 GHz4.1 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rate533 MHz4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data29
L1 cacheno data385 KB
L2 cacheno data1.5 MB
L3 cache1 MB L2 KB9 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data149 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range1.0V-1.3Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 430 and Core i5-9400F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketPPGA478FCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)27 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 430 and Core i5-9400F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States-+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron M 430 and Core i5-9400F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 430 and Core i5-9400F are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x-+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 430 and Core i5-9400F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-2666
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data42.671 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 430 and Core i5-9400F.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron M 430 169
i5-9400F 9470
+5504%

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 6
Threads 1 6
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 27 Watt 65 Watt

Celeron M 430 has 140.7% lower power consumption.

i5-9400F, on the other hand, has 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 430 and Core i5-9400F. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron M 430 is a notebook processor while Core i5-9400F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 430 and Core i5-9400F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 430
Celeron M 430
Intel Core i5-9400F
Core i5-9400F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 25 votes

Rate Celeron M 430 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.9 56547 votes

Rate Core i5-9400F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 430 or Core i5-9400F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.