EPYC 4364P vs M-5Y71

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core M-5Y71
2014
2 cores / 4 threads, 4 Watt
1.28
EPYC 4364P
2024
8 cores / 16 threads, 105 Watt
22.74
+1677%

EPYC 4364P outperforms Core M-5Y71 by a whopping 1677% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core M-5Y71 and EPYC 4364P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2277228
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data43.82
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Core Mno data
Power efficiency24.2320.50
Architecture codenameBroadwell-Y (2014)Raphael (2023−2024)
Release date27 October 2014 (10 years ago)21 May 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$281$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core M-5Y71 and EPYC 4364P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speed1.2 GHz4.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz5.4 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Die size50 mm271 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data61 °C
Number of transistors1300 Million6,570 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Core M-5Y71 and EPYC 4364P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1234AM5
Power consumption (TDP)4.5 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core M-5Y71 and EPYC 4364P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP+-
Smart Response+no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core M-5Y71 and EPYC 4364P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core M-5Y71 and EPYC 4364P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core M-5Y71 and EPYC 4364P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 5300AMD Radeon Graphics
Max video memory16 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency900 MHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core M-5Y71 and EPYC 4364P integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core M-5Y71 and EPYC 4364P integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.42560x1600@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort2560x1600@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core M-5Y71 and EPYC 4364P integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.2/12no data
OpenGL4.3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core M-5Y71 and EPYC 4364P.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes1228

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

M-5Y71 1.28
EPYC 4364P 22.74
+1677%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

M-5Y71 2034
EPYC 4364P 36124
+1676%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.28 22.74
Integrated graphics card 1.04 1.98
Recency 27 October 2014 21 May 2024
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 4 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 105 Watt

M-5Y71 has 2525% lower power consumption.

EPYC 4364P, on the other hand, has a 1676.6% higher aggregate performance score, 90.4% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 9 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 4364P is our recommended choice as it beats the Core M-5Y71 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core M-5Y71 is a notebook processor while EPYC 4364P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core M-5Y71 and EPYC 4364P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core M-5Y71
Core M-5Y71
AMD EPYC 4364P
EPYC 4364P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 31 vote

Rate Core M-5Y71 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 4364P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core M-5Y71 or EPYC 4364P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.