M-5Y51 vs M-5Y71

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core M-5Y71
2014
2 cores / 4 threads, 4 Watt
1.29
+1.6%
Core M-5Y51
2014
2 cores / 4 threads, 4 Watt
1.27

Core M-5Y71 outperforms Core M-5Y51 by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core M-5Y71 and Core M-5Y51 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22752290
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core MIntel Core M
Power efficiency24.3123.94
Architecture codenameBroadwell-Y (2014)Broadwell-Y (2014)
Release date27 October 2014 (10 years ago)27 October 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$281no data

Detailed specifications

Core M-5Y71 and Core M-5Y51 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.2 GHz1.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz2.6 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size50 mm250 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °C95 °C
Number of transistors1300 Million1300 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core M-5Y71 and Core M-5Y51 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1234FCBGA1234
Power consumption (TDP)4.5 Watt4.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core M-5Y71 and Core M-5Y51. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
SIPP+-
Smart Response++
FDI++
Fast Memory Access++

Security technologies

Core M-5Y71 and Core M-5Y51 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Key++
Identity Protection++
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core M-5Y71 and Core M-5Y51 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core M-5Y71 and Core M-5Y51. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size16 GB16 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s25.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 5300Intel HD Graphics 5300
Max video memory16 GB16 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency900 MHz900 MHz
InTru 3D++

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core M-5Y71 and Core M-5Y51 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core M-5Y71 and Core M-5Y51 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.42560x1600@60Hz2560x1600@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort2560x1600@60Hz2560x1600@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core M-5Y71 and Core M-5Y51 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.2/1211.2/12
OpenGL4.34.3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core M-5Y71 and Core M-5Y51.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes1212

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

M-5Y71 1.29
+1.6%
M-5Y51 1.27

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

M-5Y71 2034
+1.6%
M-5Y51 2002

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

M-5Y71 3778
+18.4%
M-5Y51 3190

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

M-5Y71 6518
+23.2%
M-5Y51 5291

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

M-5Y71 2503
+17.7%
M-5Y51 2127

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

M-5Y71 17.81
+45.6%
M-5Y51 25.94

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

M-5Y71 2
+26.7%
M-5Y51 2

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

M-5Y71 187
+23%
M-5Y51 152

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

M-5Y71 96
+14.3%
M-5Y51 84

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

M-5Y71 1.14
+18.8%
M-5Y51 0.96

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

M-5Y71 1.5
+36.4%
M-5Y51 1.1

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

M-5Y71 11
+24.8%
M-5Y51 9

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

M-5Y71 85
+55.2%
M-5Y51 55

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

M-5Y71 2376
+16%
M-5Y51 2048

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

M-5Y71 4278
+23.8%
M-5Y51 3454

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

M-5Y71 2467
+17.9%
M-5Y51 2093

Geekbench 2

M-5Y71 5447
+24%
M-5Y51 4391

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.29 1.27

M-5Y71 has a 1.6% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core M-5Y71 and Core M-5Y51.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core M-5Y71 and Core M-5Y51, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core M-5Y71
Core M-5Y71
Intel Core M-5Y51
Core M-5Y51

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 31 vote

Rate Core M-5Y71 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 7 votes

Rate Core M-5Y51 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core M-5Y71 or Core M-5Y51, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.