Celeron 787 vs Core 2 Quad Q9550s

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Quad Q9550s and Celeron 787 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Architecture codenameYorkfield (2007−2009)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date27 January 2009 (15 years ago)1 July 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$107

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Quad Q9550s and Celeron 787 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed2.83 GHz1.3 GHz
Boost clock speed0.83 GHz1.3 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 2.0
Bus rate1333 MHz4 × 5 GT/s
Multiplierno data13
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache12 MB (shared)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB1.5 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die size2x 107 mm2131 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)76 °Cno data
Number of transistors820 million504 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Quad Q9550s and Celeron 787 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketLGA775FCBGA1023
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q9550s and Celeron 787. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
FMA-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switching--
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+
FSB parity+no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Quad Q9550s and Celeron 787 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q9550s and Celeron 787 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad Q9550s and Celeron 787. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data16 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21.335 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)Intel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® Processors
Graphics max frequencyno data950 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core 2 Quad Q9550s and Celeron 787 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
SDVOno data+
CRTno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Quad Q9550s and Celeron 787.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 January 2009 1 July 2011
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 17 Watt

Core 2 Quad Q9550s has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Celeron 787, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 282.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Quad Q9550s and Celeron 787. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core 2 Quad Q9550s is a desktop processor while Celeron 787 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q9550s and Celeron 787, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550s
Core 2 Quad Q9550s
Intel Celeron 787
Celeron 787

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 20 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q9550s on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 787 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Quad Q9550s or Celeron 787, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.