Athlon 1000 vs Core 2 Quad Q9550s
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Quad Q9550s and Athlon 1000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Architecture codename | Yorkfield (2007−2009) | Thunderbird C (2000−2001) |
| Release date | 27 January 2009 (15 years ago) | 6 March 2000 (24 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $1,299 |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Quad Q9550s and Athlon 1000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2.83 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 0.83 GHz | 1 GHz |
| Bus rate | 1333 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 12 MB (shared) | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 180 nm |
| Die size | 2x 107 mm2 | 102 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 76 °C | 70 °C |
| Number of transistors | 820 million | 22 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 0.85V-1.3625V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Quad Q9550s and Athlon 1000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | LGA775 | A |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q9550s and Athlon 1000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| FSB parity | + | no data |
Security technologies
Core 2 Quad Q9550s and Athlon 1000 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q9550s and Athlon 1000 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad Q9550s and Athlon 1000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | DDR1 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Quad Q9550s and Athlon 1000.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 27 January 2009 | 6 March 2000 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 180 nm |
Core 2 Quad Q9550s has an age advantage of 8 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Core 2 Quad Q9550s and Athlon 1000. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q9550s and Athlon 1000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
