Celeron 6205 vs Core 2 Quad Q8200s

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Core 2 Extreme QX9650 Core 2 Extreme QX9770 Core 2 Extreme QX9775 Core 2 Quad Q8200 Core 2 Quad Q8300 Core 2 Quad Q8400 Core 2 Quad Q9300 Core 2 Quad Q9400 Core 2 Quad Q9450 Core 2 Quad Q9505 Core 2 Quad Q9550s Core 2 Quad Q9650
VS
Celeron 1000M Celeron 1005M Celeron 1007U Celeron 1017U Celeron 1037U Celeron 2950M Celeron 2955U Celeron 2957U Celeron 3855U Celeron 3865U Celeron 6205 Celeron 6305

Contents

Core 2 Quad Q8200s Core 2 Quad Q8200s
Celeron 6205 Celeron 6205

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Quad Q8200s and Celeron 6205 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Tiger Lake
Architecture codenameYorkfield (2007−2009)Tiger Lake U (2020)
Release date18 January 2009 (15 years ago)1 September 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Quad Q8200s and Celeron 6205 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.33 GHzno data
Boost clock speed0.33 GHz2/2 GHz
Bus rate1333 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)160 KB
L2 cache4 MB (shared)2.5 MB
L3 cache0 KB4 MB
Chip lithography45 nm10 nm
Die size2x 82 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)76 °Cno data
Number of transistors456 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Quad Q8200s and Celeron 6205 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketLGA775BGA1499
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q8200s and Celeron 6205. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Quad Q8200s and Celeron 6205 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q8200s and Celeron 6205 are enumerated here.

VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad Q8200s and Celeron 6205. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Quad Q8200s and Celeron 6205.

PCIe version2.0no data

Pros & cons summary

Recency 18 January 2009 1 September 2020
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 15 Watt

Core 2 Quad Q8200s has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Celeron 6205, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, a 350% more advanced lithography process, and 333.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Quad Q8200s and Celeron 6205. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core 2 Quad Q8200s is a desktop processor while Celeron 6205 is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q8200s and Celeron 6205, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200s
Core 2 Quad Q8200s
Intel Celeron 6205
Celeron 6205
Like
Like

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Core 2 Quad Q8200s Core 2 Quad Q8200s
vs
Athlon 64 X2 5000+ EE Athlon 64 X2 5000+ EE
Celeron 6205 Celeron 6205
vs
VIA C3-M C3-M-1500 C3 M C3-M-1500
Core 2 Quad Q8200s Core 2 Quad Q8200s
vs
Athlon 900 Athlon 900
Core 2 Extreme QX9775 Core 2 Extreme QX9775
vs
Pentium Dual-Core E2210 Pentium Dual Core E2210
Core 2 Extreme QX9775 Core 2 Extreme QX9775
vs
A4-9120C A4 9120C
Core 2 Quad Q8200 Core 2 Quad Q8200
vs
Athlon II X3 460 Athlon II X3 460
Core 2 Quad Q8200 Core 2 Quad Q8200
vs
Athlon II X4 615e Athlon II X4 615e
Core 2 Quad Q8200 Core 2 Quad Q8200
vs
Athlon II X4 635 Athlon II X4 635
Core 2 Quad Q8200s Core 2 Quad Q8200s
vs
Ryzen 5 7535U Ryzen 5 7535U
Core 2 Quad Q8300 Core 2 Quad Q8300
vs
i5-3317U Core i5 3317U
Core 2 Quad Q8400 Core 2 Quad Q8400
vs
EPYC Embedded 3201 EPYC Embedded 3201
Core 2 Quad Q9300 Core 2 Quad Q9300
vs
V-Series V160 V Series V160
Core 2 Quad Q9300 Core 2 Quad Q9300
vs
Athlon II X4 600e Athlon II X4 600e

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 11 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q8200s on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Celeron 6205 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Quad Q8200s or Celeron 6205, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.