Atom N2850 vs Core 2 Quad Q6600
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 and Atom N2850 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2375 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | Core 2 Quad (Desktop) | Intel Atom |
| Power efficiency | 1.04 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Kentsfield (2007) | Cedarview-M (2011−2012) |
| Release date | no data (2024 years ago) | 5 January 2012 (12 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 and Atom N2850 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 1066 MHz | no data |
| L2 cache | no data | 1 MB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 32 nm |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 and Atom N2850 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Power consumption (TDP) | 105 Watt | 6,6 Watt |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 (640 MHz) |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 105 Watt | 6 Watt |
Core 2 Quad Q6600 has 100% more physical cores.
Atom N2850, on the other hand, has a 103.1% more advanced lithography process, and 1650% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core 2 Quad Q6600 and Atom N2850. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Core 2 Quad Q6600 is a desktop processor while Atom N2850 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q6600 and Atom N2850, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
