Mobile Sempron SI-42 vs Core 2 Quad Q6600
Aggregate performance score
Core 2 Quad Q6600 outperforms Mobile Sempron SI-42 by a whopping 423% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 and Mobile Sempron SI-42 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2375 | 3192 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | Core 2 Quad (Desktop) | AMD Mobile Sempron |
| Power efficiency | 1.04 | 0.83 |
| Architecture codename | Kentsfield (2007) | Sable (2008−2009) |
| Release date | no data (2024 years ago) | 1 September 2009 (15 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 and Mobile Sempron SI-42 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| Bus rate | 1066 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 512 KB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 65 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 and Mobile Sempron SI-42 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | no data | S1g2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 105 Watt | 25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 and Mobile Sempron SI-42. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | 65 nm, 1.075 - 1.125 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.15 | 0.22 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 105 Watt | 25 Watt |
Core 2 Quad Q6600 has a 422.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.
Mobile Sempron SI-42, on the other hand, has 320% lower power consumption.
The Core 2 Quad Q6600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobile Sempron SI-42 in performance tests.
Note that Core 2 Quad Q6600 is a desktop processor while Mobile Sempron SI-42 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q6600 and Mobile Sempron SI-42, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
