C-30 vs Core 2 Extreme X9100

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Extreme X9100 and C-30 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2267not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 ExtremeAMD C-Series
Power efficiency2.80no data
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Ontario (2011−2012)
Release date15 July 2008 (16 years ago)4 January 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$851no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Extreme X9100 and C-30 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed3.06 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.06 GHz1.2 GHz
Bus rate1066 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KB64 KB
L2 cache6 MB512 KB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm40 nm
Die size107 mm275 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.05-1.2625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Extreme X9100 and C-30 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketPGA478FT1 BGA 413-Ball
Power consumption (TDP)44 Watt9 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Extreme X9100 and C-30. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data40 nm, 1.24-1.35V
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
AMT+no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Extreme X9100 and C-30 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Extreme X9100 and C-30 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Extreme X9100 and C-30. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3 Single-channel

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 6250

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Extreme X9100 2063
+1059%
C-30 178

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Core 2 Extreme X9100 2810
+597%
C-30 403

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 July 2008 4 January 2011
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 45 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 44 Watt 9 Watt

Core 2 Extreme X9100 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

C-30, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 12.5% more advanced lithography process, and 388.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Extreme X9100 and C-30. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Extreme X9100 and C-30, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Extreme X9100
Core 2 Extreme X9100
AMD C-30
C-30

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 34 votes

Rate Core 2 Extreme X9100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.9 18 votes

Rate C-30 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Extreme X9100 or C-30, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.