Turion X2 RM-74 vs Core 2 Extreme X9100

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Extreme X9100
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 44 Watt
1.29
+187%
Turion X2 RM-74
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.45

Core 2 Extreme X9100 outperforms Turion X2 RM-74 by a whopping 187% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Extreme X9100 and Turion X2 RM-74 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22852944
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 Extreme2x AMD Turion
Power efficiency2.791.22
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Lion (2008−2009)
Release date15 July 2008 (16 years ago)1 January 2009 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$851no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Extreme X9100 and Turion X2 RM-74 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed3.06 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.06 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus rate1066 MHz3600 MHz
L1 cache128 KB256 KB
L2 cache6 MB1 MB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm65 nm
Die size107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.05-1.2625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Extreme X9100 and Turion X2 RM-74 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketPGA478S1
Power consumption (TDP)44 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Extreme X9100 and Turion X2 RM-74. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization
PowerNow-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
AMT+no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Extreme X9100 and Turion X2 RM-74 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Extreme X9100 and Turion X2 RM-74 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Extreme X9100 1.29
+187%
Turion X2 RM-74 0.45

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Core 2 Extreme X9100 3834
+120%
Turion X2 RM-74 1740

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Core 2 Extreme X9100 7440
+120%
Turion X2 RM-74 3380

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Core 2 Extreme X9100 2810
+80%
Turion X2 RM-74 1561

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.29 0.45
Recency 15 July 2008 1 January 2009
Chip lithography 45 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 44 Watt 35 Watt

Core 2 Extreme X9100 has a 186.7% higher aggregate performance score, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

Turion X2 RM-74, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 months, and 25.7% lower power consumption.

The Core 2 Extreme X9100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion X2 RM-74 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Extreme X9100 and Turion X2 RM-74, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Extreme X9100
Core 2 Extreme X9100
AMD Turion X2 RM-74
Turion X2 RM-74

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 37 votes

Rate Core 2 Extreme X9100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 31 vote

Rate Turion X2 RM-74 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Extreme X9100 or Turion X2 RM-74, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.