Celeron T3000 vs Core 2 Duo T7100

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo T7100
2007
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.38
Celeron T3000
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.43
+13.2%

Celeron T3000 outperforms Core 2 Duo T7100 by a moderate 13% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo T7100 and Celeron T3000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30252967
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 Duono data
Power efficiency1.061.16
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)no data
Release date9 May 2007 (17 years ago)1 April 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$197no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo T7100 and Celeron T3000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.8 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed1.8 GHzno data
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KBno data
L2 cache2 MBno data
L3 cache0 KB1 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography65 nm45 nm
Die size143 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
Number of transistors291 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1V-1.25V

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo T7100 and Celeron T3000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketPBGA479,PPGA478PGA478
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo T7100 and Celeron T3000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching--
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo T7100 and Celeron T3000 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo T7100 and Celeron T3000 are enumerated here.

VT-x+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo T7100 0.38
Celeron T3000 0.43
+13.2%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo T7100 607
Celeron T3000 687
+13.2%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Core 2 Duo T7100 211
Celeron T3000 225
+6.6%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Core 2 Duo T7100 355
Celeron T3000 384
+8.2%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.38 0.43
Recency 9 May 2007 1 April 2009
Chip lithography 65 nm 45 nm

Celeron T3000 has a 13.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Celeron T3000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo T7100 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo T7100 and Celeron T3000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo T7100
Core 2 Duo T7100
Intel Celeron T3000
Celeron T3000

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 59 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T7100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Celeron T3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo T7100 or Celeron T3000, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.