Celeron 1000M vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Turion X2 RM-70 Turion X2 RM-72 Turion X2 RM-74 Turion X2 RM-75 Turion X2 RM-76 Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 Turion X2 Ultra ZM-87 Turion X2 Ultra ZM-88
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Core i3-3110M Core i3-3120M Core i3-3217U Core i5-3210M Core i5-3230M Core i5-3320M Core i5-3337U Core i7-3520M Core i7-3610QM Core i7-3630QM Core i7-3632QM Pentium 2020M

Aggregate performance score

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.46
Celeron 1000M
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.67
+45.7%

Celeron 1000M outperforms Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 by a considerable 46% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82
Celeron 1000M Celeron 1000M

Primary details

Comparing Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 and Celeron 1000M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29222731
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series2x AMD Turion UltraIntel Celeron
Power efficiency1.241.81
Architecture codenamePuma (2008−2009)Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release date3 June 2008 (16 years ago)20 January 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$86

Detailed specifications

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 and Celeron 1000M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speedno data1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz1.8 GHz
Bus rate3600 MHz5 GT/s
L1 cache256 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB256K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm22 nm
Die sizeno data118 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data105 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 and Celeron 1000M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketS1g2FCPGA988
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 and Celeron 1000M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD VirtualizationIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
PowerNow+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
My WiFino data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 and Celeron 1000M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 and Celeron 1000M are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 and Celeron 1000M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel Processors
Graphics max frequencyno data1 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 and Celeron 1000M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
SDVOno data+
CRTno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 and Celeron 1000M.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 0.46
Celeron 1000M 0.67
+45.7%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 1777
Celeron 1000M 2480
+39.6%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 3441
Celeron 1000M 4757
+38.2%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 1546
Celeron 1000M 1923
+24.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.46 0.67
Recency 3 June 2008 20 January 2013
Chip lithography 65 nm 22 nm

Celeron 1000M has a 45.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 195.5% more advanced lithography process.

The Celeron 1000M is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 and Celeron 1000M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

AMD Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82
Intel Celeron 1000M
Celeron 1000M
Like
Like

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82
vs
Core 2 Duo T6400 Core 2 Duo T6400
Celeron 1000M Celeron 1000M
vs
A6-1450 A6 1450
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82
vs
Turion X2 RM-74 Turion X2 RM-74
Core 2 Duo T5670 Core 2 Duo T5670
vs
Celeron N5095 Celeron N5095
Core 2 Duo T5670 Core 2 Duo T5670
vs
Ryzen 5 5625C Ryzen 5 5625C
Core 2 Duo T5670 Core 2 Duo T5670
vs
Ryzen 3 5425C Ryzen 3 5425C
Core 2 Duo T5670 Core 2 Duo T5670
vs
Ryzen 5 7520U Ryzen 5 7520U
Turion 64 X2 TL-68 Turion 64 X2 TL-68
vs
Mobile Sempron 3200+ Mobile Sempron 3200+
Athlon 64 X2 4400+ Athlon 64 X2 4400+
vs
Pentium D 820 Pentium D 820
Athlon 64 X2 4400+ Athlon 64 X2 4400+
vs
Pentium 4 P4 3.0 Pentium 4 P4 3.0
Athlon 64 X2 4400+ Athlon 64 X2 4400+
vs
Pentium 4 2.4 GHz Pentium 4 2.4 GHz
Athlon 64 X2 4400+ Athlon 64 X2 4400+
vs
Athlon 64 FX-60 Athlon 64 FX-60

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.

3.1 24 votes

Rate Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 166 votes

Rate Celeron 1000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 or Celeron 1000M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.