Celeron N2820 vs Core 2 Duo T6670

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo T6670
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.52
+62.5%
Celeron N2820
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 7 Watt
0.32

Core 2 Duo T6670 outperforms Celeron N2820 by an impressive 63% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo T6670 and Celeron N2820 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28763099
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Celeron
Power efficiency1.414.33
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Release date1 January 2009 (15 years ago)1 December 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$107

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo T6670 and Celeron N2820 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.13 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz2.39 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data56K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache2 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm22 nm
Die size107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °C105 °C
Number of transistors410 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo T6670 and Celeron N2820 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPGA478FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt7.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo T6670 and Celeron N2820. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle Statesno data+
Smart Connectno data+
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo T6670 and Celeron N2820 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB++
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo T6670 and Celeron N2820 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo T6670 and Celeron N2820. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series
Graphics max frequencyno data756 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core 2 Duo T6670 and Celeron N2820 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Duo T6670 and Celeron N2820.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data4
USB revisionno data3.0 and 2.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo T6670 0.52
+62.5%
Celeron N2820 0.32

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo T6670 827
+63.8%
Celeron N2820 505

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Core 2 Duo T6670 264
+33.3%
Celeron N2820 198

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Core 2 Duo T6670 412
+20.1%
Celeron N2820 343

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Core 2 Duo T6670 2365
+123%
Celeron N2820 1061

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Core 2 Duo T6670 4430
+120%
Celeron N2820 2010

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Core 2 Duo T6670 1850
+30.5%
Celeron N2820 1418

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Core 2 Duo T6670 52.04
Celeron N2820 48.5
+7.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.52 0.32
Recency 1 January 2009 1 December 2013
Chip lithography 45 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 7 Watt

Core 2 Duo T6670 has a 62.5% higher aggregate performance score.

Celeron N2820, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 104.5% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

The Core 2 Duo T6670 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N2820 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo T6670 and Celeron N2820, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo T6670
Core 2 Duo T6670
Intel Celeron N2820
Celeron N2820

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 27 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T6670 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 46 votes

Rate Celeron N2820 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo T6670 or Celeron N2820, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.