Xeon X3450 vs Athlon 64 X2 FX-60
Aggregate performance score
Xeon X3450 outperforms Athlon 64 X2 FX-60 by a whopping 216% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) FX-60 and Xeon X3450 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2825 | 2022 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 0.51 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | 2x Athlon 64 (Desktop) | no data |
| Power efficiency | 0.49 | 1.79 |
| Architecture codename | Toledo (2006) | Lynnfield (2009−2010) |
| Release date | no data | 8 September 2009 (15 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $241 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) FX-60 and Xeon X3450 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.66 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 1000 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 8 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | no data | 296 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 73 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 774 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) FX-60 and Xeon X3450 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | FCLGA1156,LGA1156 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 110 Watt | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) FX-60 and Xeon X3450. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.2 |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 1.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | + |
| PAE | no data | 36 Bit |
Security technologies
Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) FX-60 and Xeon X3450 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) FX-60 and Xeon X3450 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) FX-60 and Xeon X3450. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 32 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 21 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) FX-60 and Xeon X3450.
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.57 | 1.80 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
| Threads | 2 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 110 Watt | 95 Watt |
Xeon X3450 has a 215.8% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 15.8% lower power consumption.
The Xeon X3450 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 X2 FX-60 in performance tests.
Note that Athlon 64 X2 FX-60 is a desktop processor while Xeon X3450 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 X2 FX-60 and Xeon X3450, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
