Celeron Dual-Core T1600 vs Core 2 Duo T5850

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo T5850 and Celeron Dual-Core T1600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated2791
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Celeron Dual-Core
Power efficiencyno data1.62
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Merom (2006−2008)
Release date1 October 2008 (16 years ago)1 May 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo T5850 and Celeron Dual-Core T1600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz1.66 GHz
Bus rate667 MHz667 MHz
L2 cache2 MB1 MB
Chip lithography65 nm65 nm
Die sizeno data143 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistorsno data291 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo T5850 and Celeron Dual-Core T1600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socketno dataPPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)34 Watt35 Watt

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo T5850 687
Celeron Dual-Core T1600 950
+38.3%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Core 2 Duo T5850 3997
+33.2%
Celeron Dual-Core T1600 3000

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Core 2 Duo T5850 1768
+31%
Celeron Dual-Core T1600 1350

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2008 1 May 2008
Power consumption (TDP) 34 Watt 35 Watt

Core 2 Duo T5850 has an age advantage of 5 months, and 2.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Duo T5850 and Celeron Dual-Core T1600. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo T5850 and Celeron Dual-Core T1600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo T5850
Core 2 Duo T5850
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1600
Celeron Dual-Core T1600

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 24 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T5850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 13 votes

Rate Celeron Dual-Core T1600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo T5850 or Celeron Dual-Core T1600, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.