Pentium Dual T3200 vs Celeron Dual-Core T1600

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron Dual-Core T1600 and Pentium Dual Core T3200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2791not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron Dual-CoreIntel Pentium Dual Core
Power efficiency1.62no data
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Merom (2006−2008)
Release date1 May 2008 (16 years ago)1 October 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron Dual-Core T1600 and Pentium Dual Core T3200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed1.66 GHz2 GHz
Bus rate667 MHz667 MHz
L2 cache1 MB1 MB
Chip lithography65 nm65 nm
Die size143 mm2143 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Number of transistors291 Million291 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron Dual-Core T1600 and Pentium Dual Core T3200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketPPGA478no data
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron Dual-Core T1600 950
+50.6%
Pentium Dual T3200 631

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Celeron Dual-Core T1600 3000
Pentium Dual T3200 3600
+20%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 May 2008 1 October 2008

Pentium Dual T3200 has an age advantage of 5 months.

We couldn't decide between Celeron Dual-Core T1600 and Pentium Dual Core T3200. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron Dual-Core T1600 and Pentium Dual Core T3200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1600
Celeron Dual-Core T1600
Intel Pentium Dual Core T3200
Pentium Dual Core T3200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 13 votes

Rate Celeron Dual-Core T1600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 82 votes

Rate Pentium Dual Core T3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron Dual-Core T1600 or Pentium Dual Core T3200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.