Core 2 Solo SU3300 vs Core 2 Duo E7200
Aggregate performance score
Core 2 Duo E7200 outperforms Core 2 Solo SU3300 by a whopping 288% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Duo E7200 and Core 2 Solo SU3300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2790 | 3298 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Series | no data | Intel Core 2 Solo |
Power efficiency | 0.90 | 2.75 |
Architecture codename | Wolfdale (2008−2010) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
Release date | April 2008 (16 years ago) | 20 August 2008 (16 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $262 |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Duo E7200 and Core 2 Solo SU3300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
Threads | 2 | 1 |
Base clock speed | 2.53 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 2.53 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
Bus rate | 1066 MHz | 800 MHz |
L1 cache | 64 KB | no data |
L2 cache | 3 MB (shared) | 3 MB |
L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 45 nm |
Die size | 82 mm2 | 107 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 74 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 228 million | 410 Million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
VID voltage range | 0.85V-1.3625V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Duo E7200 and Core 2 Solo SU3300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
Socket | LGA775 | BGA956 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 5.5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo E7200 and Core 2 Solo SU3300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Core 2 Duo E7200 and Core 2 Solo SU3300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo E7200 and Core 2 Solo SU3300 are enumerated here.
VT-x | - | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo E7200 and Core 2 Solo SU3300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 0.62 | 0.16 |
Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
Threads | 2 | 1 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 5 Watt |
Core 2 Duo E7200 has a 287.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
Core 2 Solo SU3300, on the other hand, has 1200% lower power consumption.
The Core 2 Duo E7200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Solo SU3300 in performance tests.
Note that Core 2 Duo E7200 is a desktop processor while Core 2 Solo SU3300 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo E7200 and Core 2 Solo SU3300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.