Celeron Dual-Core T3500 vs Core 2 Duo E7200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo E7200
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.63
Celeron Dual-Core T3500
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.80
+27%

Celeron Dual-Core T3500 outperforms Core 2 Duo E7200 by a significant 27% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo E7200 and Celeron Dual-Core T3500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27882615
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron Dual-Core
Power efficiency0.922.16
Architecture codenameWolfdale (2008−2010)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release dateApril 2008 (16 years ago)26 September 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$80

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo E7200 and Celeron Dual-Core T3500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.53 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.53 GHz2.1 GHz
Bus rate1066 MHz800 MHz
L1 cache64 KB128 KB
L2 cache3 MB (shared)1 MB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size82 mm2107 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors228 million410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo E7200 and Celeron Dual-Core T3500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketLGA775Socket P PGA478
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo E7200 and Celeron Dual-Core T3500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo E7200 and Celeron Dual-Core T3500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo E7200 and Celeron Dual-Core T3500 are enumerated here.

VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo E7200 and Celeron Dual-Core T3500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo E7200 0.63
Celeron Dual-Core T3500 0.80
+27%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo E7200 993
Celeron Dual-Core T3500 1275
+28.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.63 0.80
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

Celeron Dual-Core T3500 has a 27% higher aggregate performance score, and 85.7% lower power consumption.

The Celeron Dual-Core T3500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo E7200 in performance tests.

Note that Core 2 Duo E7200 is a desktop processor while Celeron Dual-Core T3500 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo E7200 and Celeron Dual-Core T3500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo E7200
Core 2 Duo E7200
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3500
Celeron Dual-Core T3500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 220 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo E7200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 106 votes

Rate Celeron Dual-Core T3500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo E7200 or Celeron Dual-Core T3500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.