Celeron 6205 vs T1600

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron T1600 and Celeron 6205 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3066not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Tiger Lake
Power efficiency0.95no data
Architecture codenameno dataTiger Lake U (2020)
Release date1 October 2008 (16 years ago)1 September 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron T1600 and Celeron 6205 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data2 (Dual-core)
Threadsno data2
Base clock speed1.66 GHzno data
Boost clock speedno data2/2 GHz
L1 cacheno data160 KB
L2 cacheno data2.5 MB
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cache4 MB
Chip lithography65 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.075V-1.175Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron T1600 and Celeron 6205 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketPPGA478BGA1499
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron T1600 and Celeron 6205. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data

Security technologies

Celeron T1600 and Celeron 6205 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron T1600 and Celeron 6205 are enumerated here.

VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron T1600 and Celeron 6205. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs (400 MHz)

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2008 1 September 2020
Chip lithography 65 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

Celeron 6205 has an age advantage of 11 years, a 550% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron T1600 and Celeron 6205. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron T1600 and Celeron 6205, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron T1600
Celeron T1600
Intel Celeron 6205
Celeron 6205

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 8 votes

Rate Celeron T1600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Celeron 6205 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron T1600 or Celeron 6205, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.