Xeon 7130N vs Celeron N6211
Primary details
Comparing Celeron N6211 and Xeon 7130N processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2196 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 3.33 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | Elkhart Lake | no data |
| Power efficiency | 20.58 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Elkhart Lake (2022) | Tulsa (2006) |
| Release date | 17 July 2022 (2 years ago) | August 2006 (18 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $54 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Celeron N6211 and Xeon 7130N basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 3.16 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 3.17 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| L2 cache | 1.5 MB | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 8 MB |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | no data | 435 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 70 °C | 69 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 1328 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 1.1V-1.35V |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron N6211 and Xeon 7130N compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | BGA1493 | PPGA604 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6.5 Watt | 150 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N6211 and Xeon 7130N. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| FSB parity | no data | + |
Security technologies
Celeron N6211 and Xeon 7130N technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N6211 and Xeon 7130N are enumerated here.
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N6211 and Xeon 7130N. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 150 Watt |
Celeron N6211 has a 550% more advanced lithography process, and 2400% lower power consumption.
Xeon 7130N, on the other hand, has 100% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Celeron N6211 and Xeon 7130N. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Celeron N6211 is a desktop processor while Xeon 7130N is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N6211 and Xeon 7130N, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
