Core 2 Duo U7600 vs Celeron N6211

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N6211 and Core 2 Duo U7600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2198not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.33no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesElkhart LakeIntel Core 2 Duo
Power efficiency20.53no data
Architecture codenameElkhart Lake (2022)Merom-2048 (2006−2008)
Release date17 July 2022 (2 years ago)27 July 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$54no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N6211 and Core 2 Duo U7600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.2 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz1.2 GHz
Bus rateno data533 MHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB
L2 cache1.5 MB2 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography10 nm65 nm
Die sizeno data143 mm2
Maximum core temperature70 °C100 °C
Number of transistorsno data291 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
VID voltage rangeno data0.8V-0.975V

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N6211 and Core 2 Duo U7600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGA1493PBGA479
Power consumption (TDP)6.5 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N6211 and Core 2 Duo U7600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Celeron N6211 and Core 2 Duo U7600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N6211 and Core 2 Duo U7600 are enumerated here.

VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N6211 and Core 2 Duo U7600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N6211 2245
+547%
Core 2 Duo U7600 347

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Celeron N6211 2696
+113%
Core 2 Duo U7600 1263

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Celeron N6211 4693
+105%
Core 2 Duo U7600 2289

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Celeron N6211 49.66
+38.1%
Core 2 Duo U7600 68.6

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 July 2022 27 July 2006
Chip lithography 10 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 10 Watt

Celeron N6211 has an age advantage of 15 years, a 550% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron N6211 and Core 2 Duo U7600. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Celeron N6211 is a desktop processor while Core 2 Duo U7600 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N6211 and Core 2 Duo U7600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N6211
Celeron N6211
Intel Core 2 Duo U7600
Core 2 Duo U7600

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 4 votes

Rate Celeron N6211 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 9 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo U7600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N6211 or Core 2 Duo U7600, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.