Athlon 5370 vs Celeron N6211

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N6211
2022
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
1.42
+18.3%
Athlon 5370
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 25 Watt
1.20

Celeron N6211 outperforms Athlon 5370 by a moderate 18% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N6211 and Athlon 5370 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21972337
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.33no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesElkhart Lakeno data
Power efficiency20.594.52
Architecture codenameElkhart Lake (2022)Kabini (2013−2014)
Release date17 July 2022 (2 years ago)9 April 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$54no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N6211 and Athlon 5370 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed1.2 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz2.2 GHz
L1 cacheno data256 KB
L2 cache1.5 MB2048 KB
Chip lithography10 nm28 nm
Die sizeno data107 mm2
Maximum core temperature70 °C76 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data90 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N6211 and Athlon 5370 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGA1493AM1
Power consumption (TDP)6.5 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N6211 and Athlon 5370. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA-FMA4
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N6211 and Athlon 5370 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N6211 and Athlon 5370. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3-1600
Max memory channelsno data1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)AMD Radeon R3 Graphics
Number of pipelinesno data128
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N6211 and Athlon 5370 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N6211 and Athlon 5370 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N6211 and Athlon 5370.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data4

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N6211 1.42
+18.3%
Athlon 5370 1.20

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N6211 2245
+17.8%
Athlon 5370 1905

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.42 1.20
Recency 17 July 2022 9 April 2014
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 10 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 25 Watt

Celeron N6211 has a 18.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 316.7% lower power consumption.

Athlon 5370, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

The Celeron N6211 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 5370 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N6211 and Athlon 5370, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N6211
Celeron N6211
AMD Athlon 5370
Athlon 5370

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 4 votes

Rate Celeron N6211 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 14 votes

Rate Athlon 5370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N6211 or Athlon 5370, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.